Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 32% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3930 - 181 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - £29.99 vs £224.84
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-10400 - £0.22 vs £1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.24/FPS
17%
Price, £
£224.84
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
137
75%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |