Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £224.84 vs £406.3
- Up to 40% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £0.99 vs £1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-10400 - 248 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
226
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
60%
Price, £
£406.3
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for £406.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |