Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-1038NG7 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 4 days older than Core i5-1038NG7.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-1038NG7
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Core i5-1038NG7 - 230 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-1038NG7 - 20 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£325
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • May 4th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • May 4th, 2020
Single-Core
1464
87.3508353221957%
Multi-Core
4769
56.598623308806076%
Intel Core i5-1038NG7 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
May 4th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ice Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Iris Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |