Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2145 outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2145 is 1115 days older than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2145 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2145 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2145
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i5-10300H - 195 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Xeon W-2145
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | Intel Xeon W-2145 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
