Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 1134 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 127 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
123
96%
Value, £/FPS
£2.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£315
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |