Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 3125 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6200 - 174 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 45 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
