Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 1503 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-4160 - 214 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
88.4455527847049%
Multi-Core
2072
65.19823788546255%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
