Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 744 days newer than Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 91 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i3-8350K - 278 vs 277 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
278
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£564.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £564.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1474
93.52791878172589%
Multi-Core
4238
45.224629175114714%
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |