Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i3-8109U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1370 days newer than Core i3-8109U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-8109U - 217 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£110.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |