Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 60 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-7350K - 265 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £579.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
46.76328502415459%
Multi-Core
2873
13.158979526404982%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |