Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 840 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7350K - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77382 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1452
93.73789541639768%
Multi-Core
2873
45.92391304347826%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |