Buy on Amazon
£5.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 17% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610 - 143 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 55 vs 60 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
BQTEC Intel Celeron G1610 2.60 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processor LGA 1155
Buy for £5.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74986 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
29.338842975206614%
Multi-Core
739
25.722241559345633%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 60 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
