Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i3-7350K vs Ryzen 7 8840U

Core i3-7350K vs Ryzen 7 8840U: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Availability

No items available

Availability

No items available

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840U is 2528 days newer than Core i3-7350K.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

  • Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-7350K - 153 vs 132 FPS
  • Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 28 vs 60 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 16 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Dying Light 2: Stay Human.
Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Core i3-7350K Logo
Core i3-7350K

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


FPS

132

86.27450980392157%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo
Ryzen 7 8840U

Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023


FPS

153

100%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

FPS Winner

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Core i3-7350K Logo
Core i3-7350K

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo
Ryzen 7 8840U

Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i3-7350K Logo
Core i3-7350K

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


Single-Core

1452

57.98722044728435%

Multi-Core

2873

32.78183477863989%

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo
Ryzen 7 8840U

Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023


Single-Core

2504

100%

Multi-Core

8764

100%

Intel Core i3-7350K Logo

Intel Core i3-7350K

vs
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

Jan 3rd, 2017Release Date
Dec 6th, 2023
Core i3CollectionRyzen 7
Kaby LakeCodenameNot Available
Intel Socket 1151SocketAMD Socket FP8
Desktop
Segment
Mobile
2Cores
8
4Threads
16
4.2 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.3 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.1 GHz
60 WTDP
28 W
14 nmProcess Size
4 nm
42.0x
Multiplier33.0x
Intel HD 630Integrated GraphicsRadeon 780M
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.