Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1207 days newer than Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-7350K - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
