Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-7300 - 183 vs 180 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1260
78.60262008733623%
Multi-Core
2502
92.80415430267063%
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
