Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 471 days older than Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 2600X - 408 vs 407 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
407
99.75490196078431%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£187.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £187.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |