Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - £58.88 vs £108.97
- Up to 42% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-14100F - £0.22 vs £0.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i3-7100 - 288 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
272
94%
Value, £/FPS
£0.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£58.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £58.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14416 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
288
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.38/FPS
57%
Price, £
£108.97
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for £108.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |