Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2023 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-6320 - 325 vs 309 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 16 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i3-6320
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-11900
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
