Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 1703 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-6320 - 349 vs 344 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 8 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
349
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
100%
Price, £
£84.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2566 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |