Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Core i3-6320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1892 days newer than Core i3-6320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6320
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-6320 - 217 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6320 - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |