Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2408 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 51 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-6300 - 290 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 24 vs 4 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
290
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£351.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £351.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1616 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
46.87964338781575%
Multi-Core
2539
15.65061949084633%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |