Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2682 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 51 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-6300 - 165 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.63/FPS
100%
Price, £
£103.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £103.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
56.01420328450955%
Multi-Core
2539
34.60542456044705%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |