Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1420 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than FX-4100 - 56 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
