Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1093 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i3-3240T - 198 vs 189 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
37.437185929648244%
Multi-Core
971
41.56678082191781%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
