Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1002 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1620 - 123 vs 107 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 51 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
34.25460636515913%
Multi-Core
723
30.950342465753423%
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
