Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 1771 days newer than Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-6100 - 413 vs 335 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
413
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£365
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £365 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |