Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-6100 is 855 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-6350 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-6350 - £29.1 vs £49.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-6350 - £0.19 vs £0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £29.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |