Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3532 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-560 - 562 vs 443 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76674 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
443
30.806675938803895%
Multi-Core
932
16.20587723874109%
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |