Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1424 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-540 - 240 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 53 vs 73 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
240
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |