Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 3288 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-540 - 162 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 15 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-540
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 73 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
