Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 1208 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-540 - 191 vs 190 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |