Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3834 days newer than Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 73 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 38% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-530 - 599 vs 433 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
360
20.821283979178716%
Multi-Core
755
7.5274177467597205%
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |