Key Differences
In short — Core i3-5020U outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-5020U is 1236 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-5020U
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than FX-8150 - 216 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5020U - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-5020U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-5020U | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell-U | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
