Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Core i3-5015U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1887 days newer than Core i3-5015U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-5015U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 37% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-5015U - 368 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5015U - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
368
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£122.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £122.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Single-Core
700
48.95104895104895%
Multi-Core
1413
25.742393878666427%
Intel Core i3-5015U | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |