Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2110 days newer than Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Core i3-4370 - 204 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1220
75.68238213399503%
Multi-Core
2407
33.2872355137602%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
