Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 232 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1820 - 128 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
116
90.625%
Value, £/FPS
£0.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£5.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £5.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37484 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
40.24590163934426%
Multi-Core
825
34.27503115911924%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |