Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4360 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4360 is 488 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 121 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4360 - 51 vs 54 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
96.69421487603306%
Value, £/FPS
£1.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£128.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.65811965811966%
Multi-Core
992
42.79551337359793%
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |