Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2433 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Core i3-4330 - 231 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 20 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
60.94911377930246%
Multi-Core
2144
23.39845028920659%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
