Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2753 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 5% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-4330 - 267 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
267
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£151.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £151.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |