Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 699 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G550 - 167 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4170
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
34.968210717529516%
Multi-Core
629
29.53051643192488%
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
