Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 1551 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-4160T - 234 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
234
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |