Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2110 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil Village than Core i3-4160 - 304 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 20 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
63.48448687350835%
Multi-Core
2072
24.590553050083074%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |