Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1289 days newer than Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-2300 - 254 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
510
47.93233082706767%
Multi-Core
1490
71.91119691119691%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
