Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 407 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 32% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G3900 - 136 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 51 vs 54 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £128.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
54.60526315789473%
Multi-Core
992
47.87644787644788%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |