Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2185 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 17% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-4160 - 193 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 64 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2378.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
64.29003021148037%
Multi-Core
2072
14.212223060566567%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |