Buy on Amazon
£156.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1812 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4160 - 280 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
280
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£156.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X Processor (8C/16T, 36 MB Cache, 4.4 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £156.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
