Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3071 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 36% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4150 - 136 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £405.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76718 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
35.01513622603431%
Multi-Core
2047
10.183572956569325%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |