Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 794 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 10% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6200 - 125 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
