Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1439 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Core i3-4130 - 55 vs 52 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
84.97011101622545%
Multi-Core
1960
25.998142989786444%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
