Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Core i3-4010U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1092 days newer than Core i3-4010U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4010U - 170 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4010U - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4010U
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4010U | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
